How to Check Fake Experience & Fake Resumes in 2026: Complete Detection Guide

The 2026 Resume Fraud Crisis
Types of Resume Fraud
Why Traditional BGV Fails
Complete Detection Playbook
Detecting Deepfake Interviews
Founder Quick-Check List
Naraway's AI Detection Platform
FAQ

The 2026 Resume Fraud Crisis

A Series B founder recently interviewed what seemed like the perfect senior engineer. Impressive resume. Strong GitHub. Smooth technical answers. They extended an offer.

Two weeks after joining, the code quality was terrible. Basic concepts confused them. Turns out: the person who interviewed wasn't the person who showed up for work.

This isn't rare anymore. It's becoming normal.

72% Recruiters encounter fake resumes/credentials

17% See deepfake interviews (up from 3% in 2023)

25% Of candidates predicted to be fake by 2026

51% Spotted AI-created work portfolios

According to Pietos' 2025 fraud research, over 30% of resumes contain discrepancies ranging from exaggerated titles to completely fabricated experiences.

What changed in 2026:

AI writes indistinguishable resumes. ChatGPT and similar tools create perfect resumes that pass ATS systems and human screeners. No grammatical errors. Perfect keyword density. Zero substance.

Deepfake interviews are rising. Pindrop's 2025 research shows humans can only spot AI-generated audio/video with 53.7% accuracy. By 2026, 30% of enterprises consider identity verification unreliable due to deepfake threats.

Proxy interview services exploded. In India and UAE, "interview-as-a-service" agencies charge ₹5,000-25,000 per interview. One person gives interviews for 20 candidates. Same voice. Same answers. Different names.

Fake experience letters cost ₹2,500. Complete packages include: Fake HR emails with company domains, Fabricated appointment letters, Fake relieving letters, Forged payslips with accurate tax deductions.

GitHub portfolio fraud is sophisticated. Candidates fork repositories, backdate commits, copy case studies, and create fake contribution graphs. Unless you dig deep, it looks legitimate.

Reality Check

Founders are no longer fighting underqualified talent. They're fighting identity-level deception orchestrated by organized fraud networks. Traditional background verification catches paper mismatches. It cannot catch capability fraud, proxy interviews, or AI-generated personas.

Types of Resume Fraud in 2026

1. Fabricated Experience Letters

How it works: Fake HR emails (@company.com purchased domains), Company seals downloaded from Google Images, Digital signatures created with free tools, Unregistered "consulting firms" that exist only on paper.

Detection: Verify company registration (MCA for India, DED for UAE, Companies House for UK). Check GST/VAT numbers. Call listed company phone numbers. Search company employees on LinkedIn.

2. Proxy Interviews (Most Dangerous)

According to iprospectcheck's fraud research, proxy interviews involve hiring someone skilled to take interviews on your behalf. After getting the offer, a different person joins.

Common patterns:

Perfect technical answers but weak practical execution post-hire
Communication style changes dramatically after joining
Candidate avoids video or keeps camera off
Long pauses before answering (waiting for off-screen coaching)
Different timezone activity than claimed location

3. AI-Generated Resumes

Telltale signs:

Perfect English with no personality
Keyword stuffing (mentions every technology in job description)
Generic achievements without specific numbers
Similar phrasing across multiple resumes
No verifiable details (no manager names, no team sizes, no real metrics)

4. Time-Traveler Skill Claims

This is the easiest fraud to catch but often missed:

Real example: Candidate claims "Used FastAPI framework in 2015-2017." Problem: FastAPI was released in December 2018. Impossible.

Other examples:

React Hooks experience in 2017 (released Feb 2019)
Kubernetes expertise in 2013 (v1.0 released July 2015)
Terraform cloud experience in 2016 (launched mid-2019)
Next.js 13 app router in 2021 (released Oct 2022)

Simple cross-check: Google "[technology name] release date" and compare with resume timeline.

5. GitHub & Portfolio Fraud

Common tactics:

Forking popular repos and claiming ownership
Backdating commits using git commit --date commands
Copying case studies from Behance/Dribbble
Fake contribution graphs generated with scripts
Repositories with no commit history before 2 months ago

6. Fake Freelancing Agencies

Candidates claim "freelance consultant" during employment gaps. Red flags:

No client names provided (all "under NDA")
No invoices, contracts, or payment proof
Fake Upwork/Fiverr screenshots (easily edited)
Cannot explain project scope or challenges

7. Fake Manager References

This matches Recruitics' findings on reference fraud:

Scripted answers (same phrasing across multiple calls)
Generic praise without specific examples
Friends or family acting as managers
Fake LinkedIn profiles created days before application
Phone numbers that don't match company records
Unable to answer "What was their biggest weakness?"

Stop Fake Candidates Before They Cost You

Naraway's AI-powered hiring platform detects fake resumes, proxy interviews, and fraudulent portfolios before you waste time interviewing. We combine deep verification with skill validation.

✓ AI resume risk scoring
✓ GitHub authenticity scanner
✓ Behavioral fingerprinting
✓ Real-time skill testing

Get Fraud Detection Book Demo

Why Traditional BGV Fails in 2026

Background verification catches:

Identity mismatch (name, date of birth, address)
Educational degree verification (university confirms degree)
Employment dates (HR confirms joining/exit dates)
Criminal record checks

Background verification CANNOT catch:

AI-created experience (if dates align, BGV passes)
Proxy interviews (different person interviewed than hired)
Fake portfolios (BGV doesn't check GitHub authenticity)
Skill-time inconsistency (FastAPI in 2015)
Inflated KPIs (claimed 10x growth, actually 1.5x)
Deepfake candidate personas
Freelancing fraud (no official records exist)
Behavioral mismatch (personality different post-hire)

The Gap

BGV verifies papers. It doesn't verify capability, authenticity, or truth. This is why founders make bad hires even after full background checks. The documents pass. The person doesn't.

Naraway's approach: We verify capability and authenticity, not just credentials. BGV confirms employment dates. We confirm the candidate can actually do what they claim.

The 2026 Fake Resume Detection Playbook

Step 1: Timeline Sanity Check

What to verify:

Compare project dates with technology release dates
Check if employment timeline overlaps with known company layoffs
Verify gaps hidden with vague "freelancing" claims
Cross-reference multiple timelines (LinkedIn vs resume vs GitHub)

Tools: Google "[technology] release date", Company layoff news archives, LinkedIn employment history.

Step 2: Company Existence Deep Check

Verification sources:

India: MCA (Ministry of Corporate Affairs), GST registration, ROC filings
UAE: DED (Department of Economic Development), Trade license verification
Global: WHOIS domain registration date, LinkedIn employee count
Website analysis: Creation date, real office locations, actual clientele

Fake company patterns:

"Consulting" or "Solutions" in company name with no real business
One-page template website with stock photos
No verifiable clients or case studies
Only Gmail-based communication (no company domain emails)
No Glassdoor reviews or employee presence on LinkedIn
Domain registered within last 6 months

Step 3: Skill-Depth Interrogation (AI-Proof Method)

This is where fake candidates collapse. Instead of asking "Do you know React?", use these techniques:

For engineers:

"Open the GitHub repo from your resume. Walk me through the architecture decision for [specific component]."
"I'm looking at your code from line 45-67. Why did you choose this approach over [alternative]?"
"There's a bug in your authentication logic here. Can you spot it and explain the fix?"
"Recreate a simplified version of your [specific feature] live right now."

For designers:

"Show me your Figma revision history for this project. Walk me through iteration 3."
"Why did you choose this color palette? What accessibility considerations did you make?"
"Redesign this button component right now based on these requirements."

For product managers:

"Walk me through the PRD you wrote. Show me the edit history."
"Explain a feature you killed after building. Why did you kill it?"
"Show me the data that led to this product decision."

Why this works: Fake candidates memorize answers to common questions. They cannot explain specific decisions, failures, or recreate work live.

Step 4: Portfolio Authenticity Verification

For designers:

Request Figma revision history (shows timestamps, iterations)
Check auto-save logs for creation dates
Use reverse image search to find stolen designs
Ask about specific design decisions and iterations

For marketers:

Request ad account screenshots with date filters visible
Ask for Meta/Google dashboard access (view-only)
Verify claimed results match campaign budgets
Check if metrics are realistic (1000% ROI claims are red flags)

For product roles:

Request PRDs with document metadata (creation date, edit history)
Check Google Docs revision history
Verify claimed user research with actual data

Step 5: Behavioral Fingerprinting

Real professionals can explain failures and process. Fake candidates cannot.

Failure questions (fake candidates fail these):

"Tell me about a project that completely failed. What went wrong?"
"Describe a time you made a technical decision you later regretted."
"What's something you struggled with that took months to master?"
"Tell me about negative feedback you received from a manager. How did you respond?"

Process chronology questions:

"Walk me through day 1 to day 30 of this project. What happened each week?"
"How did you know [specific decision] was the right call? What data informed it?"
"Explain the sequence of technical decisions that led to this architecture."

Why this works: Fake candidates over-explain basics and under-explain nuance. Real professionals remember specific failures and decision processes because they lived them.

Step 6: Smart Reference Verification

Beyond basic "Did they work here?", ask:

Weakness questions (fake references can't answer):

"What's one area they needed improvement?"
"If you were to coach them on one skill, what would it be?"
"What situations did they find most challenging?"
"Would you rehire them? If not, why?"

Verification requirements:

Corporate email reply (not Gmail/Yahoo)
Internal extension number verification
LinkedIn mutual connection check
Verify reference is actually listed on company website/LinkedIn

Step 7: AI-Based Fraud Detection

Naraway's AI platform detects:

Resume-level signals:

Content similarity to existing fake resumes in database
Keyword stuffing patterns (mentions every technology in JD)
Sentinel words used by AI writing models
Mismatched skill clusters (frontend + embedded systems + blockchain)
Timeline-probability anomalies (senior role at age 24)

Interview-level signals:

Behavioral inconsistency (personality changes between calls)
Voice stress pattern analysis
Response latency (delayed answers suggest coaching)
Communication style mismatch (email vs call vs chat)

Portfolio-level signals:

GitHub commit pattern analysis (sudden activity spikes)
Code style consistency checks
Cross-platform identity verification
Digital footprint age (accounts created recently)

Detecting Deepfake Interviews

Based on Pindrop's deepfake detection research, here's how to spot synthetic candidates:

Visual red flags:

Facial expressions lag behind words (micro-delay)
Unnatural blinking patterns (too frequent or too infrequent)
Frozen facial expressions during speech
Edge distortion around face/hair boundaries
Inconsistent lighting between face and background
Poor lip-sync (words don't match mouth movement)

Behavioral red flags:

Refuses to turn camera on or keeps it off
Avoids sudden movements or gestures
Won't adjust camera angle when requested
Background remains suspiciously static
Audio quality doesn't match video quality

Live verification tests:

Hand test: "Please place your hand in front of your face." Deepfakes can't handle occlusion well.
Profile turn: "Turn your face 90 degrees to the left." Deepfakes struggle with extreme angles.
Object interaction: "Hold up your ID card next to your face." Deepfakes can't interact with physical objects.
Random actions: "Touch your nose, then your left ear." Deepfakes can't follow unpredictable instructions.
Disable filters: Require video filters off. Some deepfake tools work through filter interfaces.

Real Case Study

Vidoc Security exposed a candidate using deepfakes. When asked to place hand in front of face, candidate refused and ended call. Investigation revealed the AI mask resembled a Polish politician. Same fraudster attempted again with lower-quality deepfake two months later. Full case study here.

Founder Quick-Check: 10 Ways to Catch Fake Experience

1. Technology Release Date Check

Does claimed tech experience predate technology release? Instant red flag.

2. GitHub Commit History Analysis

Check commit timestamps, frequency patterns, and repository age. Ask candidate to explain specific commits live.

3. Failure Explanation Test

Ask about failures, struggles, and regrets. Fake candidates can't answer authentically.

4. Company Registration Verification

Use MCA/GST (India), DED (UAE), Companies House (UK) to verify employer existence.

5. Manager Corporate Email Confirmation

References must reply from company email, not Gmail. Verify email domain is legitimate.

6. Live Work Sample Creation

Ask candidate to recreate portion of claimed work live. Fake candidates collapse.

7. Role-Specific Scenario Questions

Ask about specific decisions, not generic "tell me about yourself" questions.

8. Portfolio Metadata Verification

Check Figma revision history, GitHub commit dates, Google Doc edit logs. Timestamps don't lie.

9. LinkedIn Endorsement Cross-Check

Do endorsements match claimed skills? Are endorsers real people with established profiles?

10. Storytelling Consistency Test

Ask same question in different calls. Fake candidates give different answers. Real experiences remain consistent.

Naraway's AI-Powered Fraud Detection Platform

Traditional hiring verifies credentials. Naraway verifies capability and authenticity.

Our fraud detection system includes:

AI Resume Risk Scoring: Analyzes 47 fraud signals including content similarity, keyword stuffing patterns, timeline inconsistencies, skill cluster mismatches. Flags high-risk resumes before human review.

Proxy Interview Detection: Monitors behavioral patterns, communication style consistency, response latency, timezone activity. Detects when interview person differs from hired person.

GitHub Authenticity Scanner: Analyzes commit patterns, code style consistency, repository age, contribution authenticity. Detects forked repos and backdated commits.

Portfolio Metadata Validator: Verifies Figma revision history, checks document creation dates, validates claimed work against actual timestamps. Catches stolen portfolios.

Real-Time Skill Testing: Live coding challenges, design tasks, problem-solving scenarios. Tests actual capability, not memorized answers.

Behavioral Fingerprinting: Tracks communication patterns, personality consistency, depth of knowledge. Detects when candidate behavior doesn't match claimed experience.

Digital Identity Verification: Cross-platform identity matching, account age verification, digital footprint analysis. Confirms candidate is who they claim to be.

Cross-Accountability Checks: Verifies references through multiple channels, checks company registrations globally, validates claimed experiences against public records.

Why This Matters

Naraway solves what HR cannot: detecting capability fraud. We don't just verify papers. We verify the person can do what they claim, is who they claim, and will perform as expected. This is the difference between checking credentials and ensuring authenticity.

FAQ

How do you detect fake resumes in 2026?

Detect fake resumes through: (1) Timeline verification - check if claimed skills existed when candidate says they used them (e.g., FastAPI in 2015 is impossible), (2) Company verification - use MCA, GST, DED registrations to confirm employer exists, (3) Portfolio authenticity - check GitHub commit history, Figma revision logs, (4) Technical depth testing - ask candidates to explain specific projects live, (5) AI-generated content detection - look for perfect grammar, keyword stuffing, generic phrasing, (6) Cross-platform consistency - compare LinkedIn, GitHub, resume for discrepancies, (7) Reference verification - ask weakness questions fake references can't answer, (8) Behavioral interviews - fake candidates can't explain failures or process chronology.

How common are deepfake interviews in 2026?

Deepfake interviews have surged dramatically: 17% of hiring managers encountered suspected deepfakes by end of 2024 (up from 3% in 2023), 72% of recruiters report AI-generated fake resumes or credentials, 15% have seen face-swapping during video interviews, 51% spotted AI-created work portfolios. By 2026, experts predict 25% of job candidates globally could be fake. Detection methods include: asking candidates to place hand in front of face, disabling video filters, watching for lip-sync delays, checking for frozen facial expressions, requiring live identity verification with government ID.

What are proxy interviews and how to detect them?

Proxy interviews occur when someone other than the candidate completes interviews. In India and UAE, 'interview-as-a-service' agencies charge ₹5,000-25,000 per interview. Detection methods: (1) Require live video with ID verification, (2) Ask spontaneous, unscripted questions about specific resume details, (3) Request screen sharing for technical tasks, (4) Check if candidate hesitates on basic questions they should know, (5) Ask about work environment details (office location, team structure, manager name), (6) Conduct surprise verification calls, (7) Test knowledge depth with follow-up questions, (8) Verify timezone matches claimed location, (9) Check if communication style matches previous interactions, (10) Require final round in-person when possible.

How to verify GitHub and portfolio authenticity?

Verify portfolio authenticity through: For GitHub - Check commit history timestamps, Verify contribution frequency patterns, Look for forked repos with no modifications, Check if commits align with claimed employment dates, Ask candidate to explain specific code sections live, Verify if repositories match resume timeline; For designers - Request Figma revision history with timestamps, Check auto-save logs and version history, Ask about design decisions and iterations, Verify if work matches claimed company style; For marketers - Request ad account screenshots with date filters, Ask for campaign performance data, Check Meta/Google dashboard access, Verify if claimed results match campaign budgets; For all portfolios - Use reverse image search for stolen work, Check creation dates vs claimed dates, Ask candidate to recreate portion live, Verify client testimonials independently.

How to Check Fake Experience & Fake Resumes in 2026

Table of Contents